YOU WERE LOOKING FOR: Answering Machine Sound Effect
If psychological explanation goes, so do the closely related notions of agency and moral responsibility. Clearly, a good deal rides on a satisfactory solution to the problem of mental causation [and] there is more than one way in which puzzles about...
For the determination of movement seems always to come about from the moving body's being propelled—to depend on the kind of impulse it gets from what sets it in motion, or again, on the nature and shape of this latter thing's surface. Now the...
The shape, timing, and effects of such actions are inseparable from their meaning. One might say that they are loaded with mental content, which cannot be appreciated other than by studying their material features. Imitation, communicative gesturing, and tool use are examples of these kinds of actions. This case involves synchronized action potentials in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Neurophilosophy is the interdisciplinary study of neuroscience and philosophy of mind. In this pursuit, neurophilosophers, such as Patricia Churchland , [25] [26] Paul Churchland [27] and Daniel Dennett , [28] [29] have focused primarily on the body rather than the mind. In this context, neuronal correlates may be viewed as causing consciousness, where consciousness can be thought of as an undefined property that depends upon this complex , adaptive, and highly interconnected biological system.
The massive parallelism of neural networks allows redundant populations of neurons to mediate the same or similar percepts. Nonetheless, it is assumed that every subjective state will have associated neural correlates, which can be manipulated to artificially inhibit or induce the subject's experience of that conscious state. The growing ability of neuroscientists to manipulate neurons using methods from molecular biology in combination with optical tools [31] was achieved by the development of behavioral and organic models that are amenable to large-scale genomic analysis and manipulation. Non-human analysis such as this, in combination with imaging of the human brain, have contributed to a robust and increasingly predictive theoretical framework. Arousal and content[ edit ] Midline structures in the brainstem and thalamus necessary to regulate the level of brain arousal. Small, bilateral lesions in many of these nuclei cause a global loss of consciousness.
To be conscious of something, the brain must be in a relatively high state of arousal sometimes called vigilance , whether awake or in REM sleep. Brain arousal level fluctuates in a circadian rhythm but these natural cycles may be influenced by lack of sleep, alcohol and other drugs, physical exertion, etc. Arousal can be measured behaviorally by the signal amplitude required to trigger a given reaction for example, the sound level that causes a subject to turn and look toward the source. High arousal states involve conscious states that feature specific perceptual content, planning and recollection or even fantasy. Clinicians use scoring systems such as the Glasgow Coma Scale to assess the level of arousal in patients with impaired states of consciousness such as the comatose state , the persistent vegetative state , and the minimally conscious state. Here, "state" refers to different amounts of externalized, physical consciousness: ranging from a total absence in coma, persistent vegetative state and general anesthesia , to a fluctuating, minimally conscious state, such as sleep walking and epileptic seizure.
These nuclei therefore belong to the enabling factors for consciousness. Conversely it is likely that the specific content of any particular conscious sensation is mediated by particular neurons in the cortex and their associated satellite structures, including the amygdala , thalamus , claustrum and the basal ganglia. Types of dualism[ edit ].
This makes a BIG difference. Answering Machine Detection AMD for Voice Broadcasting Answering Machine Detection is a technology that allows outbound dialers to identify calls answered by answering machines and voicemails. How does Answering Machine Detection work? AMD works based on the following 3 algorithms. One of the main goals of answering machine detection is to start playing the recorded message at the right time.
For a live answer, it is after a person says "Hello". For an answering machine, it is after the sound of the beep. Another benefit of answering machine detection is the option to play a message to the people who answer live and a different message to answering machines and voicemails. This is especially important when doing a live transfer campaign. In a live transfer campaign, the live answer message will say something like "Press 0 to be connected to our office to schedule your appointment.
In most cases, the live answer message will be played to people who answer and the answering machine message will be played to answering machines and voicemail systems. Unfortunately, the answer is no. The problem is that Answering Machine Detection is not an exact science and causes one of two problems. Delay - While the system tries to connect an agent. This often results in the caller saying "hello, hello" and then hanging up. False Positives - This is where the autodialer incorrectly guesses a real person as an answering machine and hangs up the call. The effect of this is that the customer will effectively get a silent call. This high level of accuracy is very good compared to other automated calling companies. We are always trying to improve it as well.
Thanks for all your help! I'll do this again for re-election! Thanks again! Thank you very much. School District Administrator Being able to contact clients before visiting their home Commercial Landscaping Service.
The Facts and the Case The cybercrime law aims to regulate access to and use of the cyberspace. Using his laptop or computer, a person can connect to the internet, a system that links him to other computers and enable him, among other things, to: 1. Access virtual libraries and encyclopedias for all kinds of information that he needs for research, study, amusement, upliftment, or pure curiosity; 2. Post billboard-like notices or messages, including pictures and videos, for the general public or for special audiences like associates, classmates, or friends and read postings from them; 3. Advertise and promote goods or services and make purchases and payments; 4. Inquire and do business with institutional entities like government agencies, banks, stock exchanges, trade houses, credit card companies, public utilities, hospitals, and schools; and 5.
Communicate in writing or by voice with any person through his e-mail address or telephone. This is cyberspace, a system that accommodates millions and billions of simultaneous and ongoing individual accesses to and uses of the internet. The cyberspace is a boon to the need of the current generation for greater information and facility of communication. But all is not well with the system since it could not filter out a number of persons of ill will who would want to use cyberspace technology for mischiefs and crimes. One of them can, for instance, avail himself of the system to unjustly ruin the reputation of another or bully the latter by posting defamatory statements against him that people can read. And because linking with the internet opens up a user to communications from others, the ill-motivated can use the cyberspace for committing theft by hacking into or surreptitiously accessing his bank account or credit card or defrauding him through false representations.
The wicked can use the cyberspace, too, for illicit trafficking in sex or for exposing to pornography guileless children who have access to the internet. For this reason, the government has a legitimate right to regulate the use of cyberspace and contain and punish wrongdoings. Notably, there are also those who would want, like vandals, to wreak or cause havoc to the computer systems and networks of indispensable or highly useful institutions as well as to the laptop or computer programs and memories of innocent individuals.
They accomplish this by sending electronic viruses or virtual dynamites that destroy those computer systems, networks, programs, and memories. The government certainly has the duty and the right to prevent these tomfooleries from happening and punish their perpetrators, hence the Cybercrime Prevention Act. But petitioners claim that the means adopted by the cybercrime law for regulating undesirable cyberspace activities violate certain of their constitutional rights.
The government of course asserts that the law merely seeks to reasonably put order into cyberspace activities, punish wrongdoings, and prevent hurtful attacks on the system. Pending hearing and adjudication of the issues presented in these cases, on February 5, the Court extended the original day temporary restraining order TRO that it earlier issued on October 9, , enjoining respondent government agencies from implementing the cybercrime law until further orders. The Issues Presented Petitioners challenge the constitutionality of the following provisions of the cybercrime law that regard certain acts as crimes and impose penalties for their commission as well as provisions that would enable the government to track down and penalize violators. Some petitioners also raise the constitutionality of related Articles , , , and of the RPC on the crime of libel.
Cybercrime Offenses. Petitioners contend that Section 4 a 1 fails to meet the strict scrutiny standard required of laws that interfere with the fundamental rights of the people and should thus be struck down. The Court has in a way found the strict scrutiny standard, an American constitutional construct,[1] useful in determining the constitutionality of laws that tend to target a class of things or persons.
According to this standard, a legislative classification that impermissibly interferes with the exercise of fundamental right or operates to the peculiar class disadvantage of a suspect class is presumed unconstitutional. The burden is on the government to prove that the classification is necessary to achieve a compelling state interest and that it is the least restrictive means to protect such interest. It is a universally condemned conduct. Ethical hackers are the equivalent of independent auditors who come into an organization to verify its bookkeeping records. Section 4 a 3 of the Cybercrime Law Section 4 a 3 provides: Section 4. Petitioners claim that Section 4 a 3 suffers from overbreadth in that, while it seeks to discourage data interference, it intrudes into the area of protected speech and expression, creating a chilling and deterrent effect on these guaranteed freedoms.
Under the overbreadth doctrine, a proper governmental purpose, constitutionally subject to state regulation, may not be achieved by means that unnecessarily sweep its subject broadly, thereby invading the area of protected freedoms. It simply punishes what essentially is a form of vandalism,[8] the act of willfully destroying without right the things that belong to others, in this case their computer data, electronic document, or electronic data message. Such act has no connection to guaranteed freedoms. All penal laws, like the cybercrime law, have of course an inherent chilling effect, an in terrorem effect [9] or the fear of possible prosecution that hangs on the heads of citizens who are minded to step beyond the boundaries of what is proper. But to prevent the State from legislating criminal laws because they instill such kind of fear is to render the state powerless in addressing and penalizing socially harmful conduct.
Besides, the overbreadth challenge places on petitioners the heavy burden of proving that under no set of circumstances will Section 4 a 3 be valid. Section 4 a 6 of the Cybercrime Law Section 4 a 6 provides: Section 4. Petitioners claim that Section 4 a 6 or cyber-squatting violates the equal protection clause[12] in that, not being narrowly tailored, it will cause a user using his real name to suffer the same fate as those who use aliases or take the name of another in satire, parody, or any other literary device. Petitioners claim that, considering the substantial distinction between the two, the law should recognize the difference. The law is reasonable in penalizing him for acquiring the domain name in bad faith to profit, mislead, destroy reputation, or deprive others who are not ill-motivated of the rightful opportunity of registering the same.
The challenge to the constitutionality of Section 4 a 6 on ground of denial of equal protection is baseless. Section 4 b 3 of the Cybercrime Law Section 4 b 3 provides: Section 4. Petitioners claim that Section 4 b 3 violates the constitutional rights to due process and to privacy and correspondence, and transgresses the freedom of the press. The right to privacy, or the right to be let alone, was institutionalized in the Constitution as a facet of the right protected by the guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Mutuc,[14] it ruled that the right to privacy exists independently of its identification with liberty; it is in itself fully deserving of constitutional protection. Within these zones, any form of intrusion is impermissible unless excused by law and in accordance with customary legal process. Petitioners simply fail to show how government effort to curb computer-related identity theft violates the right to privacy and correspondence as well as the right to due process of law. Also, the charge of invalidity of this section based on the overbreadth doctrine will not hold water since the specific conducts proscribed do not intrude into guaranteed freedoms like speech.
Clearly, what this section regulates are specific actions: the acquisition, use, misuse or deletion of personal identifying data of another. Further, petitioners fear that Section 4 b 3 violates the freedom of the press in that journalists would be hindered from accessing the unrestricted user account of a person in the news to secure information about him that could be published. But this is not the essence of identity theft that the law seeks to prohibit and punish. Evidently, the theft of identity information must be intended for an illegitimate purpose.
Moreover, acquiring and disseminating information made public by the user himself cannot be regarded as a form of theft. The Court has defined intent to gain as an internal act which can be established through the overt acts of the offender, and it may be presumed from the furtive taking of useful property pertaining to another, unless special circumstances reveal a different intent on the part of the perpetrator. Section 4 c 1 of the Cybercrime Law Section 4 c 1 provides: Sec. Petitioners claim that the above violates the freedom of expression clause of the Constitution. The law as written would invite law enforcement agencies into the bedrooms of married couples or consenting individuals. But the deliberations of the Bicameral Committee of Congress on this section of the Cybercrime Prevention Act give a proper perspective on the issue. This includes interactive prostitution and pornography, i. People[28] shows the extent to which the State can regulate materials that serve no other purpose than satisfy the market for violence, lust, or pornography.
Private property, if containing pornographic materials, may be forfeited and destroyed. Likewise, engaging in sexual acts privately through internet connection, perceived by some as a right, has to be balanced with the mandate of the State to eradicate white slavery and the exploitation of women. In any event, consenting adults are protected by the wealth of jurisprudence delineating the bounds of obscenity. Section 4 c 2 of the Cybercrime Law Section 4 c 2 provides: Sec. In theory, nothing prevents the government from invoking the ACPA when prosecuting persons who commit child pornography using a computer system. Of course, the law makes the penalty higher by one degree when the crime is committed in cyberspace. But no one can complain since the intensity or duration of penalty is a legislative prerogative and there is rational basis for such higher penalty.
Further, if the author bounces off his ideas on Twitter, anyone who replies to the tweet could be considered aiding and abetting a cybercrime. The question of aiding and abetting the offense by simply commenting on it will be discussed elsewhere below. For now the Court must hold that the constitutionality of Section 4 c 2 is not successfully challenged. Section 4 c 3 of the Cybercrime Law Section 4 c 3 provides: Sec. The OSG contends that commercial speech enjoys less protection in law. These have never been outlawed as nuisance since people might have interest in such ads. What matters is that the recipient has the option of not opening or reading these mail ads.
That is true with spams. Their recipients always have the option to delete or not to read them. To prohibit the transmission of unsolicited ads would deny a person the right to read his emails, even unsolicited commercial ads addressed to him. Commercial speech is a separate category of speech which is not accorded the same level of protection as that given to other constitutionally guaranteed forms of expression but is nonetheless entitled to protection. Unsolicited advertisements are legitimate forms of expression.
Articles , , and of the Penal Code Section 4 c 4 of the Cyber Crime Law Petitioners dispute the constitutionality of both the penal code provisions on libel as well as Section 4 c 4 of the Cybercrime Prevention Act on cyberlibel. The RPC provisions on libel read: Art. Definition of libel. Requirement for publicity. A private communication made by any person to another in the performance of any legal, moral or social duty; and 2. A fair and true report, made in good faith, without any comments or remarks, of any judicial, legislative or other official proceedings which are not of confidential nature, or of any statement, report or speech delivered in said proceedings, or of any other act performed by public officers in the exercise of their functions. Libel means by writings or similar means. The libel provision of the cybercrime law, on the other hand, merely incorporates to form part of it the provisions of the RPC on libel.
Thus Section 4 c 4 reads: Sec. Petitioners would go further. People[39] even where the offended parties happened to be public figures. The elements of libel are: a the allegation of a discreditable act or condition concerning another; b publication of the charge; c identity of the person defamed; and d existence of malice. There must be sufficient evidence to permit the conclusion that the accused in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of the statement he published. Gross or even extreme negligence is not sufficient to establish actual malice. The defense of absence of actual malice, even when the statement turns out to be false, is available where the offended party is a public official or a public figure, as in the cases of Vasquez a barangay official and Borjal the Executive Director, First National Conference on Land Transportation. Actually, the Court found the presence of malice in fact in that case. Thus: It can be gleaned from her testimony that petitioner had the motive to make defamatory imputations against complainants.
Thus, petitioner cannot, by simply making a general denial, convince us that there was no malice on her part. Verily, not only was there malice in law, the article being malicious in itself, but there was also malice in fact, as there was motive to talk ill against complainants during the electoral campaign.
Start your free trial Chapter 4. To hear your messages, press 1. When you have finished, you may hang up…. There you see all your messages in a tidy chronological list. Setup To access your voicemail, tap Phone on the Home screen, and then tap Voicemail on the Phone screen. You have two options for the outgoing greeting. You may begin drooling at the tone. Check how it sounds by tapping Play. Then just wait for your fans to start leaving you messages! In Visual Voicemail, tapping a message just selects it and activates the Call Back and Delete buttons at the bottom of the screen. You have to tap twice to start playback. Turn on Speaker Phone first. The first time people try using Visual Voicemail, therefore, they generally hear nothing! That way, you can hear the playback and continue looking over the list. Of course, if privacy is an issue, you can also double-tap a message and then quickly whip the phone up to your ear. You switch back the same way.
Everything else about Visual Voicemail is straightforward. The buttons do exactly what they say: Delete. The Voicemail list scrolls with a flick of your finger, but you still might want to keep the list manageable by deleting old messages. To do that, tap a message and then tap Delete. The message disappears instantly. To listen to deleted messages that are still on the phone, scroll to the bottom of the list and tap Deleted Messages. Call Back. Tap a message and then tap Call Back to return the call. Rewind, Fast Forward. Drag the little white ball in the scroll bar beneath the list to skip backward or forward in the message. Tap this button upper-left corner to record your voicemail greeting. Call Details. Tap the button to open the Info screen for the message that was left for you. Oh, and you can add this person to your Favorites list at this point by tapping Add to Favorites. In both cases, you also have the option to return the call right from the Info screen or fire off a text message.
Dialing in for Messages Gross and pre-iPhonish though it may sound, you can also dial in for your messages from another phone. Hey, it could happen. Wait for the voicemail system to answer. To save it, press 9. To replay it, press 4. To hear the date, time, and number the message came from, press 5. Tip If this whole Visual Voicemail thing freaks you out, you can also dial in for messages the old-fashioned way, right from the iPhone. An SMS text message is a very short note under characters—a sentence or two that you shoot from one cellphone to another. You get the message off your chest right now. The message waits for him even when his phone is turned off. And the other person can answer nondisruptively, too, by sending a text message back. You have a written record of the exchange. Well, at least not because of sound quality. Remember that you use up one of those each time you send or receive a message. Receiving a Text Message When you get an SMS, the iPhone plays a quick marimba riff and displays the name or number of the sender and the message, in a translucent message rectangle.
Otherwise, if the iPhone was asleep, it wakes up and displays the message right on its Unlock screen. You have to unlock the phone and then open the Messages program manually. Tap the very first icon in the upper-left corner of the Home screen. Either way, the look of Messages which was called Text before the iPhone 3. Tip The last 50 exchanges appear here. If you want to see even older ones, scroll to the very top and tap Load Earlier Messages. To respond to the message, tap in the text box at the bottom of the screen. The iPhone keyboard appears. Type away, and then tap Send. Assuming your phone has cellular coverage, the message gets sent off immediately.
And if your buddy replies, then the balloon-chat continues, scrolling up the screen. Tip If all this fussy typing is driving you nuts, you can always just tap the big fat Call button to conclude the transaction by voice. You can review them or resume them at any time by tapping Messages on the Home screen. A list of text message conversations appears; a blue dot indicates conversations that contain new messages. The truth is, these listings represent people, not conversations. If having these old exchanges hanging around presents a security or marital risk, you can delete one in either of two ways: From the Text Messages list: Swipe away the conversation. That makes the Delete confirmation button appear immediately.
Here you can delete all the exchanges simultaneously tap Clear All or vaporize only particularly incriminating messages. To do that, tap the round buttons for the individual balloons you want to nuke; then tap Delete 2 or whatever number the button says. Tap Done. When you tap the Forward button, a new outgoing text message appears, ready for you to specify the new recipient. But options to fire off a text message are lurking all over the iPhone. A few examples: In the Messages program. From the Home screen, tap Messages.
Tap the button at the top-right corner of the screen to open a new text message window, with the keyboard ready to go. Or tap the button, which opens your Contacts list. Tap the person you want to text. Note Your entire Contacts list appears here, even ones with no cellphone numbers. In the Contacts, Recents, or Favorites lists. In other words, sending a text message to anyone whose cellphone number lives in your iPhone is only two taps away. From Photos or Voice Memos. Tapping MMS sends you back to Messages, where the photo, video, or audio file is ready to send. More on multimedia messages shortly. You can now tap that button again to add another recipient for this same message or tap the button to type in a phone number. In any case, the skinny little text message composition screen is waiting for you now. Tip Links that people send you in text messages actually work.
For example, if someone sends you a Web address, tap it with your finger to open it in Safari. If someone sends a street address, tap it to open it in Google Maps. And if someone sends a phone number, tap it to dial. Picture, Audio, or Video Messages Man, we waited long enough for this. It was absolutely bizarre that, for all its other superpowers, the iPhone could not send photos to other cellphones, let alone audio clips or video clips. But not on the iPhone. The iPhone 3. Sadly, the original iPhone shall remain MMS-less. To send a photo or on the iPhone 3GS a video, tap the icon next to the box where you type your text messages shown on the facing page at right.
Two buttons appear: Take Photo or Choose Existing. Tap the one you want and then tap Choose. If you choose Take Photo or Video instead, then your Camera app opens so you can take a new picture or on the iPhone 3GS snag a video clip. In any case, you now return to your SMS conversation in progress—but now that photo or video appears inside the Send box. Type a caption or comment, if you like. Then tap Send to fire it off to your buddy.
Capturing Text-Message Goodies In general, text messages are fleeting; most people have no idea how they might capture them and save them forever. Copy and Paste helps with that.
Call a long distance number without using the 1. Please check the number and try your call again" record this onto your machine, and be sure you get the beeps in there. It will drive people nuts wondering if they have the right number. I don't exist at the moment, but if you leave your message, name and number, I'll call you back when I am All our operators are tied-up right now, so if you leave a name, number, a list of transgressions and bark like a dog, we'll get right back to you with your penance.
No comments:
Post a Comment